The Net New Music Community Since 1994
We're sorry, but this discussion has just been closed to further replies.
Tags:
Dear Jeff Harrington III, esq.
Please throw me off this new music site which is dedicated to theoretical composers who know their craft and not to " just some free impro, jam session to relax between recording sessions." Please contact Apple Records and tell them to stop selling Revolver, Sgt. Pepper, and Magical Mystery Tour which contain moments of non-theoretical experimental music which was created in a probable drug haze. Please inform Braxton, Lewis, Mitchell, and Taylor that they are Black and that they should not be delving into the Euro/American Vanguard tradition. While your at it, please let Phil Glass, Corey Dargel, and others continue to write Pop...I mean art songs that are really inane but are praised because of their classical/academic training. If you can, please inform the new complexity, downtown music scene to continue aping King Crimson and Henry Cow and taking those influences and making them really boring. Also, let Glenn Branca know that he is a rock musician and that Rhys Chatham's Guitar Trio is a minimalist masterwork of the late 20th century. Johnny Ramone or Chetah Chrome never could have composed such a brilliant and seminal work. One more thing, please list a set of rules and commandments for proper musical construction. Thanks.
Daniel Forró said:I don't think it can be interesting stuff at all, maybe just some free impro, jam session to relax between recording sessions... It's possible to record four hours of such sound carpets in four hours. What we can expect from pop musicians without enough theoretical knowledge and practical experience with vanguard music? Only some wannabe stuff, maybe a result of their rather snobish dream to enter different spheres of high academic art? Even my two years old daughter can create very modern sounding textures on piano when she starts to jump on it, playing clusters, random notes etc. (Everybody knows story behind Scarlatti's Cat Fugue). Beatles didn't need to enter this music world, they were good in what they did, that means pop songs. Trips outside from this limited material couldn't be good, because they were limited as composers and performers. Of course that means nothing wrong. To be limited means also to be specialist in something. They tried to learn new things (Indian ragas, old English vaudeville music, ...) and use it in their music, like a small innovations, but generally such style synthesis was not so successful (again, because of lack of compositional craftsmanship). So I see this attempt just as another bubble and trick to get attraction again and maybe some money if he will find enough people willing to pay for it (times are difficult now, he must pay for gas...)
Daniel Forro
Considering the Beatles connected to anything avant-garde makes me think of Stu Sutcliffe, and how it would have been interesting, given his artistic interests, if he had been in the group when they got to their work-in-the-recording-studio-only phase. Of course Stu would have had to have lived to have that happen [awkward laugh here], but none the less it hits me as an interesting "what could have been".
Heck yeah. I'd love to hear Rubber Soul or Sgt. Pepper bearing Stu's influence. He might have been their Syd Barrett or Keith Reid or Robert Hunter, or Brian Jones . . .
XLR said:Considering the Beatles connected to anything avant-garde makes me think of Stu Sutcliffe, and how it would have been interesting, given his artistic interests, if he had been in the group when they got to their work-in-the-recording-studio-only phase. Of course Stu would have had to have lived to have that happen [awkward laugh here], but none the less it hits me as an interesting "what could have been".
© 2009 Created by Jeff Harrington on Ning. Create Your Own Social Network