NetNewMusic

The Net New Music Community Since 1994

... is enough for a lifetime. Why should we listen to anything more?

It is rich, always beautiful, intelligent, "humane", sometimes sweet, sometimes aggressive, expresses a whole lot of emotions but always in a "contained" way - in one word it reflects the totality of life. It is even "scientific"...

Does his "style" have any flaws? I don't think so...

Tell me if you agree! Or contradict me (if you dare)! :)

Tags: moshier

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Steve's music is awesome. As far as the type of music he writes, its the tops. However, I wouldn' t suggest anyone simply listen to minimalistic-style band music exclusively as much as I would wish anyone to exclusively listen to romantic music.

Reply to This

categorizing just kills the experience! don't do that!

J.C. Combs said:
Steve's music is awesome. As far as the type of music he writes, its the tops. However, I wouldn' t suggest anyone simply listen to minimalistic-style band music exclusively as much as I would wish anyone to exclusively listen to romantic music.

Reply to This

;)

adam kondor said:
categorizing just kills the experience! don't do that!

J.C. Combs said:
Steve's music is awesome. As far as the type of music he writes, its the tops. However, I wouldn' t suggest anyone simply listen to minimalistic-style band music exclusively as much as I would wish anyone to exclusively listen to romantic music.

Reply to This

Holy s*** guys, imagine waking up and seeing this on the site: You're too kind and, believe it or not, I'm at a loss for words except to say many thanks for the acknowledgment!!

Reply to This

It's time to start an objective discussion about your music!

Steve Moshier said:
Holy s*** guys, imagine waking up and seeing this on the site: You're too kind and, believe it or not, I'm at a loss for words except to say many thanks for the acknowledgment!!

Reply to This

I like Steve's stuff. He says what he means . . .

Reply to This

What'd be a reason then for not saying what one meant?

Johnny & Faith said:
I like Steve's stuff. He says what he means . . .

Reply to This

---is enough for a lifetime. Why should we listen to anything more?

I dig Steve's work very much and am glad to have found it.
But I also dig listening to my faucet drip.
And by the way, to my brain/ear, compairing Steve's work to a dripping faucet and all it contains is meant as a huge compliment.
However, I would not want to give up one for the other.
Call the plumber and crank Steve?
Dunno.
The choice of listening to everything or only Steve is kinda odd me thinks...

Reply to This

Trendiness, monetary considerations, if composing soundtracks the needs of the film, the dictates of a patron or sponser, all sorts of reasons . . . ;-)

adam kondor said:
What'd be a reason then for not saying what one meant?

Johnny & Faith said:
I like Steve's stuff. He says what he means . . .

Reply to This

"I think that the stranger, someone I don't know – or, to generalise, someone we don'’t know – is himself or herself, a source, a figure of the enigmatic.'"

Reply to This

Just want to add my voice to the choir: Genuinely dig Steve's music. Intelligent and accessible, complex and simple. Thanks for sharing it here, Steve.

Reply to This

Photobucket

Reply to This

Reply to This

RSS

About

Jeff Harrington Jeff Harrington created this social network on Ning.

Create your own social network!

Badge

Loading…

© 2009   Created by Jeff Harrington on Ning.   Create Your Own Social Network

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!